I have a sarcastic streak but this is frightening.

• Posted: 2008-08-14T13:11:00Z

I like the dazed, tazed gaze of Chirpy McNewslady there.

• Posted: 2008-08-14T13:16:48Z

The last panel should read “Average Americans who plan to vote for Obama.”

• Posted: 2008-08-14T14:12:38Z

Again spewie, with the predictable response. Do you ever think?

• Posted: 2008-08-14T14:21:14Z

Hey Spewie! The last panel does represent those Americans who consistently vote against their own economic interest and their childrens’ future and instead vote for opposing bleeep marriage and for opposing abortion.

• Posted: 2008-08-14T16:15:47Z

All the time ricky poo. It’s just that I have to resort to the lowest common demoninator to make sure that your fellow moonbats understand and reasonably comprehend what I have to say.

• Posted: 2008-08-14T19:50:29Z

Wow spewie, your ego rivals John Edwards. Pretty pathetic.

• Posted: 2008-08-14T21:29:34Z

Don’t give us that, Stew. I doubt if you give a flying rat’s tush about anything but getting attention…and that’s all you want here, nothing more.

You know what’s truly sad about you? You actually seem to believe that if you say you’re beating someone enough times, it’s true.

Doesn’t work that way. A boxer ain’t won till someone ELSE raises his glove. And as I pointed out before, you don’t seem to be generating any kind of support from the other conervatives on this board.

Believe me, I know what I’m talking about. I’ve seen your kind many, many times, on many different forums ( Carlyle Groupie, aztekman, cornopean, topcat, LibsLuvVlad…the list goes on and on. )

No one wants them to shut their pie-holes more than their fellow conservatives…and they always end up the same way. ( What way that is you’re going to find out for yourself, if you keep on travelling the troll road. )

• Posted: 2008-08-15T04:16:39Z

Simon - concern trolling is oh so 2002. The only reason why you are trying this tack is that you are tired of me calling BS on the abject moonbattery that exists here.

Fail. Again.

• Posted: 2008-08-15T13:38:45Z

‘Concern trolling’? LMAO!

Stew, I care about as much for you as I do for what I scraped off my shoe this morning. My concerns is for the rest of the readers, who have to put up with your nonsense.

Keep it up, Charlie…you’re only hastening the inevitable.

And, while yer at it, quit pretending that you’re making some kind of heroic stand here. This isn’t David meets Goliath Stewzie, it’s more like Bambi meets Godzilla…and YOU ain’t the big lizard, sonny-boy.

You’re more like someone whose been playing too much World of Warcraft.

“Abraccadabra, Hocus-Pocus…I say the magic word, ‘Fail’ and my opponent magically disappears.”

Oops, looks like I’m still here.

And I’ll still be here LONG after ‘the inevitable’ happens.

Oh, and ‘Moonbattery’…sounds like a solar cell that only works at night.

Precisely the kind of invention we may expect from a wingnut.

• Posted: 2008-08-15T13:51:39Z

“StewieZ sad:
The last panel should read “Average Americans who plan to vote for Obama.” ”

It’s to be taken with a box of salt and it’s cruel (but funny if you’re in a liberal’s shoes :D ), but I’ve heard that in the last election, the IQ of those who voted for Kerry is higher than the one of those who voted for Bush

http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2004/US-Election-IQ2004.htm

Mwahahahahahahaha!

Hop, hop, hop, the frog turns into a “moonbat” and flies away flap flap flap

• Posted: 2008-08-15T14:17:06Z

Oh Simon, are you one of those tolerant liberal moonbats who tries to get people who don’t walk in lockstep with you banned?

Are you frantically sending those e-mails to the folks at gocomics.com begging them to ban me because it is just too hard on you?

Are you upset because this site doesn’t have the “one non-moonbat post” rule that leads to immediate banning like your heroes the Kos or the DU?

Awwwwwwwwwww…

Fail. Yet again.

• Posted: 2008-08-15T18:04:22Z

No one should be banned, we’re here to debate, aren’t we?

• Posted: 2008-08-15T18:24:37Z

My, what an optimistic view you have… Debating Stew is like (in terms he might understand) trying to play chess against a pro-wrestler. You try to explain the moves and they think they can win by following their script and beating you over the head with the chessboard. Not much there in terms of high-minded debate.

• Posted: 2008-08-15T19:59:51Z

Well, if there is one thing I do crave it is someone capable of debate. Sadly, so far all I have here are primarily Kos Klown grade moonbats, and there is no point in even trying to discuss anything with those types. Might you be something different? Wouldn’t hurt my feelings to be able to rise from the lowest common demoninator.

• Posted: 2008-08-15T21:41:57Z

Stew, I must admit…

I have grossly underestimated your literary talents.

You may posssess all the eloquence of the average howler monkey and a vocabulary to match…but gosh-o-blood, when it comes to creating fantasy worlds, you’re right up there with JK Rowling.

LOL! Give it up already! I haven’t tried to get you banned, Junior. If I had, you’d know about it; I’d have said so, publicly on this forum.

( See, I don’t believe in sneaky tactics like going behind someones back…and/or making false accusations. I leave that sort of thing to the neo-cons. )

But the fact that out of all the folks here, you would assume that I’m the only one capable of such a thinkg is probably the most flattering reply I’ve yet had on this forum.

( If you think that by ‘the inevitable, I meant you were looking at getting banned, you’re even more clueless than I imagined. )

Oh…and it’s not that I don’t want to have a debate with you, Stewzie-Q…it’s just that my ‘durty lib’rul’ sense of fairness precludes me from engaging in a war of words with an unarmed opponent.

• Posted: 2008-08-16T02:57:12Z