Recent Comments

1. about 2 hours ago on Luann

   There was a serious accident in front of our house, and a local TV station interviewed my husband. We didn’t record it or call a lot of people, but many of our friends saw it and complimented Hubby on how well-spoken he was – no ums, ers, or y’knows.

2. about 3 hours ago on Calvin and Hobbes

   He’s going to end up snuggling with a pillow – on the sofa!

3. about 3 hours ago on One Big Happy

   His memory is fine, and he has a master’s degree in changing the subject.

4. about 3 hours ago on Non Sequitur

   Norway and Sweden are perfect examples of how it should be done.

5. about 3 hours ago on Non Sequitur

   Amen to that!

6. about 3 hours ago on Pickles

   My first husband would have done that. Hubby is a real helpmate.

7. about 13 hours ago on Pickles

   You both live in the house. Why should it one person’s job to do it all?

8. about 13 hours ago on Pickles

   Are we siblings? That worked with my mum nearly every time.

9. about 13 hours ago on Clay Bennett

   Thanks! There are some people who had trouble – read, pitched a fit – over the fact that none of these doctors have had Trump as a patient, but you don’t need a PHD to say Hitler was a megalomaniac, or Nero suffered from parental alienation.

10. about 13 hours ago on Non Sequitur

    OK, so I’m not supposed to feed the troll, but good lord!

    You are technically correct, but allowing AI to generate multi-ethnic images created some ridiculous situations. Images depicting women and people of color during historical events or in positions historically held by white men were the most controversial. For example, one render displayed a pope who was seemingly a Black woman. None of the Founding Fathers were People of Color or Oriental. Images of brown people wearing World War II Nazi uniforms with swastikas on them caused outrage, prompting Google to temporarily disable the tool.